Over 30 Years Experience

The Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists

0800 29 800 29
Contact

Video-Witnessed Wills and Contest a Will after Probate

Contact Us

contact

Davinder Singh Bal

Consultant Solicitor

The Changing Landscape of Will Witnessing:

Contest a Will after Probate

The legal landscape surrounding wills has undergone a significant shift, leading to a greater risk of Contest a will after Probate and with the recent news that the government will not extend the legislation permitting remote witnessing via video link. This article delves into the temporary amendment, its implications, and what is the future of contest a will after probate.

A Temporary Solution in Extraordinary Times

Responding to the Pandemic

In response to the unprecedented social distancing measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government enacted a special measure in July 2020. This amendment to the Wills Act 1837 allowed for wills to be witnessed virtually, a stark contrast to the traditional in-person requirement. News outlets were filled with stories of wills being witnessed through windows and car bonnets, highlighting the lengths people went to in these extraordinary times.

Swift Response and Retroactive Application

The amendment was formalized in September 2020 and retroactively applied to January 2020, demonstrating a swift response to the urgent need. Initially set to expire in January 2022, the provision was extended for an additional two years.

Low Uptake and Security Concerns

Caution from Professionals and Testators

Despite the authorization, surveys revealed a low uptake of video witnessing. Official guidance even recommended it as a last resort, emphasizing the importance of in-person witnessing whenever possible. This suggests a cautious approach by both legal professionals and testators.

Potential for Fraud and Exploitation

However, the temporary measure sparked concerns about potential security risks and exploitation.

Mr Andrew Lucas said “Video witnessing raises concerns about contesting wills after probate due to potential fraud, duress, undue influence, or lack of testamentary capacity. Court cases will clarify the legal impact, but challenges are likely with contest a will after probate more commonplace.”

Protecting Vulnerable Clients

While embracing technological advancements, Gani underlines the need to prioritize vulnerable clients:

“We must consider how best to protect them when considering permanent changes to the law surrounding will witnessing.  If someone feels a vulnerable testator was pressured or manipulated during a video witnessing, they may be more likely to contest a will after probate.”

Back to Basics: Implications of the Expired Amendment

Return to Pre-Pandemic Requirements

With the expiration of the amendment at the end of January 2024, wills witnessed via video link will no longer be valid. This eliminates the flexibility previously offered during the pandemic. However, it’s crucial to remember that the video witnessing provision was always intended as a temporary solution.

Addressing Concerns During the Pandemic

During the height of the pandemic, many individuals were isolated or unable to meet witnesses in person due to lockdown restrictions. The amendment addressed this pressing need by adapting the law to the unique circumstances. Nevertheless, practitioners voiced concerns about potential undue influence exerted on testators during virtual witnessing. Other issues included verifying a testator’s capacity and safeguarding against fraud. These concerns likely contributed to the limited adoption of video witnessing and the potential for future contests.  In some instances, these concerns may lead to beneficiaries contesting a will after probate if they suspect the video witnessing process was compromised.

The Future of Will Witnessing: Modernization on the Horizon

Law Commission Recognizes the Need for Change

While the impact of video-witnessed wills on potential claims remains unclear, the temporary measure has undeniably highlighted the need for modernizing will witnessing practices. The Law Commission has recognized this need, acknowledging the growing use of digital documents and signatures across various contexts.

Project Modernization and Consultation

The project to modernize will witnessing began in 2016, and a supplemental consultation paper issued in 2023 explored the possibility of electronic wills. This consultation period ended in December 2023, and legal professionals now await the Law Commission’s recommendations.

Moving Forward: Re-emphasizing Traditional Practices

In-Person Witnessing Required Again

In the absence of any further extensions, wills must now be executed in accordance with the pre-amendment provisions of Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837. This necessitates the physical presence of two witnesses who must observe the testator signing the will and declare its validity.

Contesting a Will After Probate

Importance of Proper Execution and Potential Grounds

The potential security risks associated with video witnessing underscore the importance of ensuring that wills are properly executed.  If there are doubts about the validity of a will, or if a beneficiary believes they have been unfairly excluded, they may consider contesting a will after probate has been granted.  This process, however, is generally more complex and expensive than contesting a will before probate

For instance, if a video recording of the witnessing process appears tampered with, it may be grounds to contest a will after probate.

The Importance of Legal Guidance

Whether you are considering creating a new will, have questions about the current witnessing requirements, or are concerned about the validity of an existing will, seeking professional legal advice is crucial. An experienced solicitor can guide you through the process, ensure your wishes are properly documented, and assist you in navigating any potential disputes, including contesting a will after probate

Conclusion: Contest A Will Today Can Be Your Guide Through Contentious Probate Matters

The legal complexities surrounding wills and probate can be daunting, especially when disputes arise.  If you have concerns about the validity of a will or believe you have been unfairly excluded as a beneficiary,  Contest A Will Today can be your trusted partner in navigating these challenging situations.

Our team of experienced probate solicitors possesses a deep understanding of contesting wills after probate. We will work closely with you to understand the specifics of your case and explore all available options.  We can guide you through the complex legal processes involved in contesting a will, including:

  • Evaluating the Grounds for Contest a will after Probate: We will meticulously assess the potential grounds for contesting the will, such as undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity, or improper execution.
  • Gathering Evidence: Our team will assist in gathering evidence to support your claim, including witness statements, medical records, and financial documentation.
  • Negotiation and Mediation: Whenever possible, we will explore options for resolving the dispute through negotiation or mediation before resorting to litigation.
  • Court Representation: If litigation becomes necessary, our skilled lawyers will represent you effectively in court, protecting your rights and advocating for your interests.
contest a will, protesting a will, protest a will, contesting a will

Contesting a will after probate can be a stressful and lengthy process. Contest A Will Today is here to provide the legal expertise and support you need throughout this challenging time. Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your specific situation and explore your options.

contact

Davinder Singh Bal

Consultant Solicitor

Frequently asked questions.

Disputes over wills can arise in several circumstances, including:

  • Testamentary capacity: The person who made the will (known as the testator) must have had the mental capacity to understand what they were doing and the consequences of their actions. This means that they must have been able to understand the nature and extent of their property, the people they were giving their property to, and the people they were excluded from their will.

 

  • Valid execution: The will must have been executed correctly under the law. This means it must be in writing, signed by the testator, and witnessed by two independent witnesses.

 

  • Undue influence: The testator must have made the will freely and without any pressure from others. The will may be invalid if someone was unduly influenced to make a will. Undue influence can occur when someone takes advantage of a testator’s vulnerability, such as if the testator is elderly, ill, or has a mental disability.

 

  • Fraud or forgery: If the will was forged or if someone fraudulently induced the testator to make the will, the will may be invalid.

 

Claims against a will must usually be made within six months of the grant of probate being issued. This is the legal document that gives the executor the authority to administer the estate. If a claim is not made within this time, it may be too late to challenge the will.

As such, executors often wait until this six-month period has expired before distributing the estate. This is to avoid having to distribute the estate and then having to take it back if a successful claim is made against the will.

Here are some examples of how these disputes can arise:

  • A family member may dispute a will if they believe that the testator did not have the mental capacity to make a will. For example, if the testator was suffering from dementia or Alzheimer’s disease at the time the will was made.
  •  

A family member may dispute a will if they believe that it was not executed correctly. For example, if the will is not signed by the testator or if it is not witnessed by two independent witnesses.

 

  • A family member may dispute a will if they believe that they were unduly influenced to make the will. For example, if a caregiver or another family member pressured the testator to make the will in their favour.

 

  • A family member may dispute a will if they believe that it was forged or if someone fraudulently induced the testator to make the will. For example, if someone forged the testator’s signature on the will or if someone lied to the testator about the contents of the will.

If you are thinking about disputing a will, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible. We can assess your case and advise you on your legal options.



Types of Trusts

Many different types of trusts can be set up, depending on your specific needs and goals. Some of the most common types of trusts include:
Bare Trusts: A bare trust is a simple type of trust in which the trustee holds the assets for the benefit of the beneficiary. The beneficiary is entitled to the income and capital of the trust as soon as they are old enough to receive them.

Interest in Possession Trusts: An interest in possession trust is a type of trust in which the beneficiary is entitled to the income from the trust immediately, but not to the capital until a later date. This type of trust is often used for minor beneficiaries or for beneficiaries who are not yet responsible enough to manage their own money.

Discretionary Trusts: A discretionary trust is a type of trust in which the trustee has the discretion to decide how and when to distribute the income and capital of the trust to the beneficiaries. This type of trust is often used for families with multiple beneficiaries or beneficiaries with special needs.

Accumulation Trusts: An accumulation trust is a type of trust in which the income from the trust is accumulated and not distributed to the beneficiaries until a later date. This type of trust is often used to save for a specific purpose, such as a child’s education or a retirement fund.

Mixed Trusts: A mixed trust is a type of trust that combines elements of different types of trusts. For example, a trust may be a discretionary trust for one beneficiary and an interest in possession trust for another beneficiary.

Settlor-Interested Trusts: A settlor-interested trust is a type of trust in which the settlor (the person who creates the trust) retains some interest in the trust assets. For example, the settlor may retain the right to receive income from the trust or to appoint the trustee.

Non-Resident Trusts: A non-resident trust is a type of trust that is created and governed by the laws of a country other than the country where the settlor or beneficiaries reside.
Which type of trust is right for you will depend on your specific needs and goals. It is important to consult with an estate planning attorney to discuss your options and choose the type of trust that is best for you.
Here are some examples of how different types of trusts can be used:
A bare trust can be used to hold assets for a minor child until they reach the age of majority.

An interest in possession trust can be used to provide income to a beneficiary who is not yet responsible enough to manage their own money.

A discretionary trust can be used to manage assets for a family with multiple beneficiaries or for beneficiaries with special needs.

An accumulation trust can be used to save for a specific purpose, such as a child’s education or a retirement fund.

A mixed trust can be used to achieve a variety of different goals, such as providing income to one beneficiary and preserving capital for another beneficiary.

A settlor-interested trust can be used to retain some control over trust assets after the settlor has created the trust.

A non-resident trust can be used to reduce estate taxes or to protect assets from creditors.
It is important to note that this is just a brief overview of the different types of trusts. There are many other types of trusts available, and each type of trust has its own specific features and benefits. For more information please visit www.gov.uk/trusts-taxes/types-of-trust

Inheritance trust disputes can be complex and varied, but some common scenarios include:

  • Disputes over the validity of the trust: This can happen if the settlor (the person who created the trust) does not have the mental capacity to create a trust, or if the trust deed was not executed correctly.

 

  • Disputes over the interpretation of the trust deed: If the trust deed is poorly drafted or unclear, it can lead to disputes between the trustees and beneficiaries about how the trust should be administered.

 

  • Disputes over the appointment or removal of trustees: Trustees have a legal duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries. If a trustee is not acting in the best interests of the beneficiaries, the beneficiaries may apply to the court to have the trustee removed.

 

  • Disputes over the investment of trust assets: Trustees have a legal duty to invest trust assets prudently. If a trustee makes investments that are too risky or that lose money, the beneficiaries may sue the trustee for breach of duty.

 

  • Disputes over the distribution of trust assets: Trustees have a legal duty to distribute trust assets to the beneficiaries in accordance with the terms of the trust deed. If a trustee distributes trust assets incorrectly, the beneficiaries may sue the trustee for breach of duty.

 

Here are some specific examples of inheritance trust disputes that have occurred in the UK:

  • In one case, a beneficiary disputed the validity of a trust deed on the grounds that the settlor (the person who created the trust) did not have the mental capacity to create a trust at the time it was set up.

 

  • In another case, a beneficiary sued the trustees for breach of duty after the trustees made a number of risky investments that lost money.



  • In a third case, a beneficiary sued the trustees for breach of duty after the trustees distributed trust assets to the beneficiaries in a way that was not in accordance with the terms of the trust deed.

 

Other possible disputes include:

  • A beneficiary was expecting more than what is set out in the trust document. This may be because the beneficiary had a reasonable belief that they would receive more, or because the trust document is unclear about the beneficiary’s entitlement.

 

  • The individual who set up the trust was provided with negligent or misleading advice. If the settlor was not properly advised about the consequences of setting up a trust, or if they were given incorrect information, they may be able to challenge the trust.

 

  • The trust document is either incomplete or unclear about the wishes of the deceased. If the trust document is incomplete or unclear, it can lead to disputes between the trustees and beneficiaries about how the trust should be administered.

 

  • A trustee acts against the best interests of the beneficiary or doesn’t administer the trust correctly. Trustees have a legal duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries. If a trustee breaches their duty, the beneficiaries may sue the trustee.

If you are involved in an inheritance trust dispute, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible. We can assess your case and advise you on your legal options.

Contesting a will is challenging the validity of a will. This can be done on a number of grounds, including.

  • The testator (the person who made the will) did not have the mental capacity to make a will.
  • The will was not executed correctly, i.e., it was not signed by the testator or witnessed by two independent witnesses.
  • The testator was unduly influenced to make the will.
  • The will was forged or fraudulent.

 

Contentious probate is any dispute about the administration of a deceased person’s estate. This can include disputes about

  • The validity of the will.
  • The interpretation of the will.
  • The appointment or removal of executors.
  • The distribution of the estate assets.
  • The management of the estate.
  • In the UK, contentious probate is dealt with by the High Court.

 

The main difference between contesting a will and contentious probate is that contesting a will is specifically challenging the validity of the will, while contentious probate can include a wide range of disputes about the administration of an estate.

Here is an example:

Contesting a will: A beneficiary challenges the validity of a will on the grounds that the testator did not have the mental capacity to make a will.

Contentious probate: A beneficiary disputes the interpretation of a will and argues that they are entitled to a larger share of the estate than they have been given.

It is important to note that the two terms are often used interchangeably. For example, a lawyer might say that they are “dealing with a contentious probate matter” when they are actually challenging the validity of a will.

If you are thinking about contesting a will or pursuing a contentious probate claim, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible. We can assess your case and advise you on your legal options.

The time limit for making a contentious probate claim in the UK is six months from the grant of probate. This is the legal document that gives the executor the authority to administer the estate.

If you do not make your claim within this six-month time limit, you may need to apply to the court for permission to make a late claim. The court will only grant permission if you have a good reason for not making your claim on time.

There are a number of factors that the court will consider when deciding whether to grant permission for a late claim, including:

  • Why did you not make your claim on time?
  • The strength of your case.
  • Whether the other beneficiaries will be prejudiced if your claim is allowed to proceed.
  • If the court grants you permission to make a late claim, you will need to file your claim within 28 days.

 

It is important to note that there are some exceptions to the six-month time limit. For example, if the executor has committed fraud or concealed assets from the beneficiaries, the beneficiaries may be able to make a claim after the six-month time limit has expired.

If you are thinking about making a contentious probate claim, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible. A lawyer can assess your case and advise you on the time limits that apply and whether you have a good case.

Here are some examples of when you might be able to make a late contentious probate claim:

  • You were not aware of the death of the deceased until after the six-month time limit had expired.
  • You were unable to make your claim on time because you were ill or incapacitated.
  • The executor has deliberately concealed information from you about the estate.
  • The executor has committed fraud in the administration of the estate.

 

The 12-year limit for making a contentious probate claim in the UK applies to claims for reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975. This means that if you are making a claim for financial provision from an estate, you must do so within 12 years of the date of the deceased’s death.

The reason for the 12-year limit is to encourage people to make their claims as soon as possible after the deceased’s death. This is because it can become more difficult to investigate and prove a claim after a long period of time has elapsed.

If you are unsure whether you are able to make a late contentious probate claim, you should seek legal advice.

Most disputes in the UK are resolved out of court through mediation and negotiation. This is because it is generally faster, cheaper, and less stressful for all involved.

If you are considering disputing a will, it is important to contact a contentious probate specialist before you involve any other relatives or beneficiaries of the estate. A specialist lawyer can advise you on your legal options and help you to resolve the dispute quickly and efficiently.

Here are some of the benefits of resolving a will dispute out of court:

  • It is faster and cheaper than going to court.
  • It is less stressful for all involved.
  • It allows you to maintain relationships with other family members and beneficiaries.
  • You have more control over the outcome of the dispute.

 

There are a number of steps that you can take to try to resolve a contentious probate dispute without going to court, including

  • Negotiation: You can try to negotiate a settlement with the other parties to the dispute. This may involve making concessions on your part, but it can be a good way to avoid the time and expense of court proceedings.
  • Mediation: Mediation is a process where an independent mediator helps the parties to reach a mutually agreeable settlement. Mediation can be a good way to resolve a dispute without going to court, but it is important to note that it is not binding on the parties.
  • Arbitration: Arbitration is a more formal process than mediation, and it is binding on the parties. However, it can still be a good way to resolve a dispute without going to court.

 

If you are unable to resolve the dispute amicably, you will need to file a claim with the High Court. The court will then hold a hearing to decide the case.

Contact our Team

For a free initial conversation call

0800 29 800 29

email Us

News and Insights